摘要
目的 对实验室间比对的结果统计方法进行探讨,提高药品检测能力验证项目组织者的统计能力。 方法 采用稳健统计法Z比分数方法和“迭代计算”方法,对关键统计技术进行讨论。结果 Z比分数方法和迭代计算方法的稳健平均值分别为77.71%、77.63%,稳健标准差分别为0.66、0.67,变异系数分别为0.85%、0.86%。结论 选择正确的统计方法对能力验证结果的判断具有重要的作用。将迭代法得到的最终稳健平均值,和Z比分数得到的中位值进行参考比较,得到真值的最佳估计值范围,对于离群尤其是可疑数据的判断可以更为准确。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore rational statistical methods for analysis of the results of inter-laboratory comparisons, which will be helpful to improve the statistical analysis ability of organizers of proficiency testing project against pharmaceutical laboratories. METHODS Robust statistical Z-score method and iterative computation method were used to analyze the assay result of cefminox sodium powder for injection respectively, and the critical statistical parameters of the two methods were compared. RESULTS The critical statistical parameters of robust statistical Z-score method anf iterative computation method were as follows: the robust average were 77.71% and 77.63%, the robust standard deviation were 0.66 and 0.67, and the coefficients of variation were 0.85% and 0.86%, respectively. CONCLUSION It is very important to select the correct statistical approach to evaluate the proficiency of pharmaceutical testing laboratories. By comparing the steady average and the median value of Z-score, the range of best estimates for the true value can be found, and the judgment for the outliers can be more accurate.
关键词
实验室间比对 /
结果统计方法 /
头孢米诺钠
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
inter-laboratory comparison /
statistical method /
cefminox sodium
{{custom_keyword}} /
吴婷,杨文凤,张慧文.
实验室间比对结果统计方法的探讨[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2016, 51(2): 135-138 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2016.02.013
WU Ting,YANG Wen-feng,ZHANG Hui-wen.
Exploration of Statistical Methods of analysis of Inter-laboratory Comparison Results[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2016, 51(2): 135-138 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2016.02.013
中图分类号：
R927
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Accreditation Criteria for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories(检测和校准实验室能力的通用要求) . 2005.
[2] GUO Y. Health Service Management(卫生事业管理). Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2008:6.
[3] China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment. CNAS-GL03:2006. Guidance on Evaluating the Homogeneity and Stability of Samples Used for Proficiency Testing(能力验证样品均匀性和稳定性评价指南). 2006.
[4] China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment. CNAS-GL02:2006. Guidance on Statistic Treatment of Proficiency Testing Results and Performance Evaluation (能力验证结果的统计处理和能力评价指南). 2006.
[5] KANG F F, WANG Z G. New method for the establishment of the target value in external quality assessment and the robust statistical for the uncertainty. Lab Med(检验医学),2013,28(9):854-855.
[6] GB/T 28043-2011. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons(利用实验室间比对进行能力验证的统计方法) . 2011.
[7] International Organization for Standardization. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO 13528, ISO, 2005.
[8] ZHONG K,WANG W,LI S N , et al. Application of robust statistics in the national clinical chemistry examination external quality assessment . China Metrol(中国计量),2010,16(12):46-48.
[9] WANG L B,YANG M C,ZHAI P J, et al. Discuss of statistical methods commonly used in pharmaceutical analysis proficiency testing . Chin Pharm Aff(中国药事),2012,26(8):809-813.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(610 KB)
